Mercury Rising 鳯女

Politics, life, and other things that matter

Hello? Brunswick? Brodkorb? Berg? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

Posted by Phoenix Woman on January 9, 2008

The aforementioned promoters of the Greatest Non-Scandal of 2007, the heated attempt to prove Mark Ritchie guilty of, of, of something (well, besides beating Crazy Mary Kiffmeyer in the last election), now look like utter dingbats in view of the fact that (as the sane people among us had been predicting) Ritchie’s been exonerated:

The summary of the Legislative Auditor’s findings:

  • Secretary of State Mark Ritchie did not misuse state resources when he organized civic education events and collected contact information from the participants. The events were appropriate activities of the Secretary of State’s office, and the contact information fulfilled a public purpose.
  • Secretary of State Mark Ritchie did not violate Minnesota law when he provided the contact information to his campaign since the information is “public data” under Minnesota law.
  • Secretary of State Mark Ritchie did not fulfill his legal obligation to make a full and timely response to a request for information from the Legislative Auditor.


So Ritchie was slow in responding, but the GOP operative-driven dust-up was without merit, just broken news.

It’s going to be awfully tough for Mitch Berg to accuse State Legislative Auditor Jim Nobles of being a DFL hack, since, as Charlie of Across the Great Divide reminds us, Mitch is already on record with the opposite opinion:

Jim Nobles – the state’s legislative auditor – is known as a person of scrupulous integrity; his office is no partisan hacketeria.

Of course, as The Wege notes, neither DJ Tice nor his fellow wingnuts in the comments section of TBQ in the Strib will really and truly admit that Ritchie’s been exonerated.  (So far, no mention of how Strib reporter Mark Brunswick, in the course of trying to follow the script seemingly written by State GOP Chair Ron Carey on making a scandal out of public data used for unsolicited mailings, himself went and used public data for unsolicited mailings.)  For a much more honest account, see AP writer Brian Bakst’s piece, which is the one many if not most outstate Minnesotans (and non-Strib-readers) will see in their local papers.

5 Responses to “Hello? Brunswick? Brodkorb? Berg? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?”

  1. Charles said

    So, tell me again why anyone buys the Strib?

    As for the Republicans, I’m sure they’ll attack Ritchie for not having gotten as much work done while under investigation.

  2. [...] my favorite response is the always-apoplectic “Phoenix Woman” from Mercury Rising, who tries to spin the news as a win for Ritchie.  Note, Ms. Woman:  being proven not to be corrupt is something a good SoS might file under [...]

  3. Charles said

    I see that the right-wingers haven’t figured out that not being corrupt is a good start and something they might try.

  4. Charles, WRT that particular example, it sounds like I pricked a nerve on a nervy prick. Poor baby!

  5. [...] jockstraps. (Never mind that the last Republican-driven effort to trash Ritchie came up with nothing to show for it; they apparently figure that if they can keep flinging mud against him, some of it will unfairly [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>