Attack The Strength, Not The Weakness
Posted by Phoenix Woman on February 13, 2008
Karl Rove was at Choate the other day, cowing most of the people who dared attack him and generally enjoying himself immensely, from what it appears.
The funny thing about Rove is that the Democrats who are all a-twitter about him and his myths fail to see that his successes are built largely on this one principle:
ATTACK YOUR ENEMY’S STRENGTH. Not the weakness, but the strength.
See, politics is NOT like judo, in that it’s not a situation where you can find a foe’s weak point and use it to topple him/her. But it IS like judo, in that the best way to defeat an opponent is to neutralize his/her greatest strength — or better yet, turn it against him/her.
Remember 2004, and how John Kerry was running as a war hero? Rove responded with the “Swift Boat” campaign. (Which was cunning on his part — I thought for sure that he’d be using Kerry’s “Winter Soldier” appearance and his throwing the medals in the trash can against him. Instead, he had surrogates come out and make shit up out of whole cloth, which the media obediently swallowed and was still reporting as unquestioned fact in October of 2004, right before the election and months after it had been first debunked.)
Remember 2000, and the insurgent war hero McCain in Michigan nearly derailing Bush’s coronation with a primary win? Rove and Robertson stopped him in South Carolina with, among other things, tales of the confessions he made when at the Hanoi Hilton. (Never mind that these confessions were false and he was tortured into making them.) Suddenly, McCain became a crazy coward collaborator with the Commies.
Now look at 2008. McCain’s now being buffed up again by desperate Republicans as the war hero who understands our nation’s security issues best of all. The press is pushing this constantly as a given, as Glenn Greenwald notes.
Instead of letting this slide by unquestioned, Democrats need to do what Rove would do, what The Nation‘s Ari Melber tells them to do, and what Salon‘s Gary Kamiya tells them to do: Attack this myth head-on, and apply the Sledgehammer of Truth directly to its forehead. Point out how crashingly wrong McCain was and is on Iraq, and how willingly the “maverick” shills for Bush. Keep it up, keep exposing the rotten reality behind his “straight talk” pose (Keating Five, anyone?) and his constantly getting it wrong on our security.
Speaker Pelosi and Carl Levin made a start Monday by pointing out that the “surge” failed to achieve its stated goal of sparking political reconciliation among Iraq’s major players. In fact, of the eight surge benchmarks, only one has, even by the most generous standards, come close to being met, and others are are even farther away from being met than they were pre-surge. Of course, the righties have been playing “let’s move the goalposts”, but let’s not let them get away with that.
This entry was posted on February 13, 2008 at 12:48 am and is filed under 2008, Bush, Bush Family Evil Empire, BushCo malfeasance, Busheviks, GOP bullying, GOP/Media Complex, half-vast rightwing conspiracy, Iraq war, John Kerry, John McCain, Karl Rove, mythmaking, The smear industry, The Surge. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
7 Responses to “Attack The Strength, Not The Weakness”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







Stormcrow said
I think you’re right about hanging McCain’s warmongering around his neck and making him wear it like an albatross.
But I differ about your analysis of the point of attack.
This isn’t attacking your enemy’s strength. This is hitting him where he doesn’t expect to be hit.
I doubt that you do much computer gaming if I read some of your previous work aright. But one thing you learn really, really fast if you play first-person shooters is “Don’t get surprised”. You get surprised in one of those games and you are in deep, deep doo-doo. You end up getting shot into doll rags by enemy AIs you could wipe out in less time than it takes to tell the tale under normal conditions.
Hillary’s campaign got surprised by Obama’s quite badly this last few weeks. Everybody, including me, thought she had the better organization. Wrong. Now, this is the third major primary day in a row that she’s lost badly.
The Kerry campaign didn’t expect the Repukes to just make up shit. So they got surprised.
If your ultimate success depends on the functioning of a large, complex, and ad-hoc organizational structure – like a campaign organization, for instance – you aren’t going to be able to “turn on a dime”. So getting surprised in a major way can be irretrievable.
McCain has been walking into this trap with his eyes wide shut for the last five years. Incredibly stupid, but then, that’s what you get from adhering to the “official” ideology of a failing empire: runaway stupidity.
Let’s make him wear it.
MEC said
I’ve seen a McCain campaign ad. He’s running for “Commander in Chief”. That means he’s going to need a war to maintain the supremacy of C-in-C over the other presidential roles. If Obama is the Democratic candidate, he can exploit that better than Clinton could: “Have you seen John McCain’s ads? He thinks the president’s job is making war. Do you want another four years of pouring your tax money into Halliburton’s pockets instead of using it for education, for health care, for safe roads and bridges?”
Stormcrow said
That means he’s going to need a war to maintain the supremacy of C-in-C over the other presidential roles.
Yup. He’s committed. He’s bought into W’s wars, body, soul, and political future.
I agree about Obama. His voting record on this subject is a lot cleaner than Clinton’s. He can take the high ground and drop rocks down on McCain the live long day. Hillary can’t do that, because when she tries it, somebody is going to call her on her record.
Not that McCain has much chance of making it in any event. But I DO NOT want to see that man in the White House.
McCain wouldn’t have much incentive to remove all those “movement conservative” human time bombs W has inserted into every Federal agency. And we’d end up with Huckabee running the country after the job killed McCain.
MEC said
I don’t want to see McCain as President because the man is a “straight talker” the way Bush is a “compassionate” conservative. I don’t trust him. He’ll continue Bush’s destructive policies and nobody will notice because the mediawhores will be too busy making the case for his canonization.
Phoenix Woman said
Being prepared for any contingency is pretty much basic Sun Tzu. Plus, assuming the worst of a group of people who have already demonstrated their capacity for the worst is always a smart idea. (Or, as Eric “Otter” Stanton told “Flounder”: “You f-ed up! You trusted us.”)
Stormcrow said
All true, and quite elementary.
But that doesn’t mean that people are going to DO things this way. LOL. Human beings are not rational actors most of the time.
Ask most disgusted ex-libertarians. That is the first and worst flaw in that whole fabric of ideas. LOL.
Kirk Muse said
Make sure no McCain supporter Google: “The wife U. S. Republican
John McCain callously left behind.”