Bradblog:
The Connecticut State Election Commission announced this morning in Hartford that “it cannot make a full and fair determination of the allegations” against Ann Coulter who was alleged to have committed voter fraud twice in the state by voting illegally from her residence in New York City while being registered at her parents home in the Nutmeg State…
Coulter is contending in turn, that as a 41 and 43 year-old Constitutional attorney and best-selling author living in New York City and having moved away from “her childhood home in New Canaan” decades earlier — where she originally registered to vote in 1980 at the age of 19 — in 2002 and 2004, even after having purchased her $1.5 million condominium in NYC, her parents house was still her “bona fide residence”.
It’s a shame Daniel Jarvis Brown, the NY resident still registered at his “childhood home” in Connecticut, as we detailed last year, didn’t have attorneys smart enough to help him make that same claim when he agreed to settle virtually identical charges against him a year or two ago…
However, she told them, “her residences in New York City, even the one that she purchased in 2003 and appears to own to this day, were secured by necessity and…she had no personal and/or permanent connection to them like she had to the residence in New Canaan.”
But that’s not what she stated publicly when facing voter fraud charges in Florida.
Moreover, the document notes that Coulter’s parents have since died, and her childhood home in Connecticut “is held in a trust administered by a relative.” In short, she never moved back to Connecticut after moving out of her parents home decades ago.
However, Coulter’s own admissions, voting record, and even tax records in the state of Florida would suggest that she simply lied to the CT investigators to evade the rule of law. Again
I guess people with two faces get to vote twice. This is the kind of shenanigans would have gotten any attorney without her level of privilege disbarred, and possibly embarred.