Posted by Charles II on January 29, 2010
On MercRising, we often joke that NPR stands for Nice Polite Republicans, since they have such ethics-free standards for Mara Liasson and Juan Williams, among many other examples of political bias. But this instance is not just impolite. It shows that NPR can be openly ugly:
When progressive historian Howard Zinn died on January 27, NPR’s All Things Considered (1/28/10) marked his passing with something you don’t often see in an obituary: a rebuttal.
After quoting Noam Chomsky and Julian Bond, NPR’s Allison Keyes turned to far-right activist David Horowitz to symbolically spit on Zinn’s grave. “There is absolutely nothing in Howard Zinn’s intellectual output that is worthy of any kind of respect,” Horowitz declared. “Zinn represents a fringe mentality which has unfortunately seduced millions of people at this point in time. So he did certainly alter the consciousness of millions of younger people for the worse.”
As FAIR noted, when racialist and apartheid-supporter William F. Buckley died, NPR didn’t find someone on the left to explain why he deserved to go to Hell. And it’s not just because people on the left are all polite.
Posted in historians, media, Media machine, mediawhores | 5 Comments »
Posted by Charles II on January 29, 2010
The ACLU does a lot of good stuff. The southern California chapter deserves a lot of credit for taking on tough issues, like Tasers. But the national organization consistently sides with corporations against human beings. They were longtime defenders of the tobacco companies’s right to addict people, even as they were taking large amounts of money from the industry. More recently, they sided with Citizens United against the FEC, a case that resulted in the overthrow of all campaign finance restrictions on corporations:
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission … Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 prohibits unions and corporations (both for-profit and non-profit) from engaging in “electioneering communications.” The legislative definition of an “electioneering communication” was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2003 and then substantially narrowed by the Supreme Court in 2007. In scheduling this case for reargument, the Court specifically requested briefs on whether section 203 should now be struck down as facially unconstitutional. The ACLU has consistently taken the position that section 203 is facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment because it permits the suppression of core political speech, and our amicus brief takes that position again.
Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitzrakis, SC:
The Supreme Court’s atrocious Citizen’s United green light for unlimited corporate campaign spending had a willing accomplice — the American Civil Liberties Union.
As long-time supporters, we are horrified by the ACLU’s betrayal of political reality and plain common sense.
Standing proudly with the victorious corporate hacks on the steps of the SCOTUS was none other than the legendary First Amendment crusader Floyd Abrams.
Keith Olberman has called him a “Quisling” for aiding and abetting this catastrophic confirmation of corporate “personhood.”…
It has been reported that the ACLU Board is now considering endorsing limits on campaign spending. Abrams has been reported as arguing that “The worst thing you could do – the absolutely worst thing you could do – is transform a civil liberties organization into a liberal political organization.”
But this decision has transformed the ACLU into a conservative political organization, working to arm the ultimate enemies of democracy with unlimited monetary and political power.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is a far more worthy organization to receive your contributions than the ACLU.
Posted in ACLU, capitalism as cancer, civil rights, Constitution, corruption | 2 Comments »
Posted by MEC on January 29, 2010
This is Alex’s favorite place during the winter. Note the Paw Of Possession.
Posted in Alexander the Great, Friday Cat Blogging | 8 Comments »