Mercury Rising 鳯女

Politics, life, and other things that matter

To Draw Attention Away From His Role in Ensign Scandal, Coburn Attacks Feds

Posted by Phoenix Woman on June 2, 2011

Oscar Wilde Samuel Johnson got it half-right: Patriotism is indeed one of the last refuges of a scoundrel, but bashing government employees is also a favorite refuge for those seeking to draw attention away from their own actions. Witness the case of the infamous Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), who recently ordered up yet another Whoopeee! Let’s Race to the Bottom! report and got the arch-conservative-talking-points-distributing Moonie Times to push it for him:

About 77,000 federal employees across the United States — including lawyers, air traffic controllers, medical personnel and information technology specialists — had higher salaries in 2009 than the governors of the states they worked in, a new report shows.

The data from the Congressional Research Service could add fuel to a debate on Capitol Hill about whether the salaries and benefits of federal workers are too high compared with their counterparts in the private sector. The study was first reported by the Washington Times.

The information was requested by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who has argued that federal workers should be paid less as the government seeks ways to rein in its deficit.

Let’s set aside the utter silliness of the idea that state legislatures and not the United States Congress and Senate should be dictating Federal salaries. (Gee, are there any other Congressional powers that Senator Coburn thinks should be given away to the states?)

Let’s also set aside the fact that Coburn has this upside down: The study shows that states don’t pay their governors enough. Governors must deal with lobbyists who themselves make far more than the governors do, and whose employers have CEOs who make millions. That’s just not right — no CEO should be making more than the governor of a state, much less the President of the United States.

Let’s even set aside the fact that the doctors and lawyers and air traffic controllers Coburn’s bashing are all people at the very tops of their pay scales, often in high-cost localities (much of Colorado, for instance, has extremely high costs of living, on par with New York City and San Francisco). Furthermore, these are people who in most cases had to work many, many years to get to these pay grades. Considering that Federal salaries top out well under $160,000 a year even in high-cost localities (and that’s only after ten or more years of service) and many new doctors and lawyers have well over $250,000 in college student loan debts alone (debts which are almost impossible to discharge via bankruptcy), what Coburn is doing is telling the best and the brightest new doctors and lawyers that he doesn’t want them working for Uncle Sam.

Let’s look at the interesting timing of this report.

Funny how Coburn decided to order this up just as the legal heat’s being turned up on his good buddy John Ensign — heat that’s starting to scorch Coburn himself:

Hampton’s attorney testified that Coburn took an active role in the negotiations between Hampton and Ensign, and that the role included proposing specific resolutions.

On May 22, 2009, the report states, Hampton’s attorney spoke with Coburn on three occasions.

In addition to the letter to the Department of Justice, the Senate committee sent another referral letter to the Federal Election Commission, stating that Ensign and others might have violated laws under that agency’s jurisdiction.

Hey, if I had something like that staring me in the face, I’d probably try to distract attention from it too.

(Crossposted to Renaissance Post and MyFDL.)

2 Responses to “To Draw Attention Away From His Role in Ensign Scandal, Coburn Attacks Feds”

  1. Charles II said

    This has got to be the first thing Coburn has done in the Senate, besides posturing on abortion. He is not widely known as a legislator, much less a policy wonk.

  2. Charles II said

    In the indictment of John Edwards, it calls contributions by third parties to help keep the mistress happy and quiet illegal campaign contributions. Edwards’ attorney said–I think quite correctly– that prosecuting Edwards for this was “novel and untested.” What the article did not manage to mention is that what Edwards is accused of is exactly what John Ensign is accused of. Except that in Ensign’s case it’s actually a lot worse, since part of the payoff was a job to conduct illegal lobbying.

    I am, as I am sure are all good Democrats, disgusted that John Edwards abused our trust (not to mention the trust of his wife, Elizabeth) in having an affair and lying to keep it secret to advance his political ambitions. But whenever prosecutors start inventing ways to prosecute people, I start to get concerned. Not for Edwards or for Ensign, both of whom probably deserve whatever they get, but for the law. The pursuit of John Edwards increasingly looks like yet another example of prosecuting the man, rather than applying the law.

    I suppose we’ll know when prosecutions are laid for all of the adulterers in Washington.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: