Mercury Rising 鳯女

Politics, life, and other things that matter

Rupert Murdoch: “I’m out of touch”/update 4

Posted by Charles II on July 19, 2011

Testimony to the Committee on Culture, Media, and Sport. Murdoch’s properties aren’t culture, so I guess this is either about media or sport. See Guardian for full live blog.

Not very enlightening testimony. Rupert feigns deafness, James emphasizes that hush money to victims was paid out after the criminal case had been settled and the police had limited responsibility to Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire and Co. Rupert answers a pointed question about willful blindness to say that they didn’t do any such thing. James claims not to know the limits for payouts that have to be reported higher up, or how they’re accounted for, but asserts that they comply with all tax regulations. Rupert says that payoffs to Mulcaire after conviction must have been authorized at levels higher than managing editor–either Les Hinton or chief legal officer. James denies knowing about these post-trial payouts, says he was surprised.

They’re lying, of course, but probably not in a prosecutable way, unless their firewall breaks.

So, how much were Brooks and Hinton paid on severance? Rupert says it’s confidential. James says there’s commercial confidentiality, but nothing to hinder legal inquiries.

Now we get the our lawyers lied to us defense over the discovery of a dossier of documents at their law firm. What did you do about it once you found out? Well, we passed the dossier to the police, of course (didn’t demand the firing of whoever at the law firm failed to find the documents when they should have, apparently).

Rupert: “I wasn’t kept in the dark. I may have been too lax….”

Would Murdoch, having experienced the glare of inquiry, change tactics on his tabloids? Vague response meaning no.

Some Conservatives, notably Davies and Collins, are asking good questions.

Why did employees think they could break the law? No answer, just more trite contriteness. This is really the question. Those employees had editors who would have to have known not just their sources but their methods, and those editors had managing editors who should have been curious about how their investigators got so lucky. And, most important, their lawyers would have had to have been brought in on sufficiency of sourcing.

Another talking point is grinding down Gordon Brown. Murdoch: Brown’s wife and my wife Wendy Wendi struck up a friendship. Kids played together. Hope we can patch things up.

Whoa! Hearing interrupted as a young man reportedly lunges at Murdoch and is punched by Wendy Murdoch Wendi Deng (Murdoch) and arrested. What irony that a hearing on Murdoch turns into a tabloid event. Wonder if they hired the lunger. Nope, UK Uncut sponsored this foam pie. Bad move, I think, but I can understand why people are frustrated with this sort of dog-and-pony show.

We are about to complete the third hour of the Murdochs’ one hour of testimony.

Final questions by Conservative Louise Mensch say, basically, everyone does phone hacking (Daily Mirror editor has even boasted about it in a book), so could that have explained why News of the World thought it could do whatever it wanted? Giving Murdoch a wonderful opening to say that even if everyone does it, he won’t put up with it. Then asked whether he thought he should resign, he says, No, the people who betrayed me should pay for it. I’m the right man to clean it up. A chilling smile. As John Dean says in post-testimony comments, these people have no remorse.

Correction: Louise Mensch has been forced to walk back, though thanks to Parliamentary privilege not actually retract, the assertion that former Mirror editor and current CNN personality Piers Morgan had confessed to phone hacking. Looks like The Guardian had the same impression of her as I did, calling her questioning “antics.”

The story the media will carry will be, as the Guardian blog makes clear in its summary, Poor Rupert Attacked!”

Coda: I couldn’t stand to watch Rebekah Brooks testify. She’s innocence itself. Louise Mensch again ran interference, dragging in Piers Anthony of CNN, who will very soon I predict find himself unemployed and the rest of the tabloids. Operation Motorman, which exposed the seamy underside of tabloid journalism and led to major reforms of British law, was all so long ago, Brooks implies. And I never knew about any private investigators except to unearth the locations of pedophiles to force the British government to pass Sarah’s Law. A worthy effort until one realizes it has had essentially no practical effects to protect children, but did serve to sell a lot of newspapers.

They are all without remorse. If they go to jail, they’ll be exclaiming over how unfair it all is.

Helene Mulholland and Matthew Taylor, The Guardian:

David Cameron’s chief of staff, Ed Llewellyn, stopped Scotland Yard briefing the prime minister on the phone-hacking scandal in September 2010, a senior police officer has told a panel of MPs.

John Yates, the Met assistant commissioner who was in charge of the review of evidence into phone hacking in 2009 and who quit on Monday, told MPs that Cameron’s chief of staff told him it was not appropriate for him to brief the prime minister on the hacking investigation, adding: “And I’d be grateful if it wasn’t raised”.

One question answered: Sir Paul Stephenson, ex-Scotland Yard, said the owner of the luxury spa (Champneys) where he was given free lodging while recovering from surgery, was a family friend, and that he didn’t know that Wallis had a business relationship with Champneys until later. It’s still incomprehensible to me why he thought that a free gift of lodging amounting to thousands of dollars and paid to the top police official of Scotland Yard could not be regarded as improper.

I think the key issue is the e-mails belatedly turned over by Harbottle and Lewis, the law firm. How that happened is critical to understanding what happened. And if the lawyers find themselves under legal culpability, they will find a way to tell their side of the story.
Crossposted to FDL where, unsurprising to me, there’s no interest in it. I assume they are still trying to find novel ways to say, Obama is an a–hole, (see here for a typical example) rather than focusing on how to change the game rules under which we are forced to operate. Adding: this is not to detract from the quality of the posts generated by people like DDay, or the importance of Jane visiting congressional offices. The comment is directed toward some of the commenters, with of course many exceptions.

Update: well, smack my gob! They added a nice graphic of Rupe. I don’t know who to thank!
The transcript of the hearing is here

13 Responses to “Rupert Murdoch: “I’m out of touch”/update 4”

  1. MEC said

    As with all cases like this, the Murdochs must teeter on the fine line between “obviously lying” and “too clueless to be allowed charge of anything”.

    • Charles II said

      I’ve seen corporate sociopaths close at hand, MEC. They are vicious predators, their whole being focused on cannibalization of others and preventing the same from being done to themselves. Their psychology is not fundamentally different from people who kidnap, rape, and murder. Just their manners.

  2. jo6pac said

    Using the ronnie ray gunn big D, I’m out of the Loop

    • Charles II said

      That was Rupert, feigning deafness and puzzlement during the first half of his hearing, then perking up and being coherent when he wanted to be.

      • Phoenix Woman said

        Uh-huh. The Sergeant Schultz Defense, which is particularly offensive considering his longtime reputation for micromanagement, insistence on following his rules, and intolerance of non-sycophancy.

  3. jo6pac said

    When I go to FDL main I don’t see the Rupert story you wrote only when I use the link do I see it.

  4. Charles II said

    Thanks to you, Jo, and to PhoenixWoman for posting comments at FDL. Some days I do wonder why I bother.

    Jo, FDL has fragmented itself into so many sites that it’s impossible to keep track. As a lowly newbie, all I rate is a MyFDL page, which is sort of the garbage bin of FDL. Posts can be and are promoted, sometimes temporarily to the main page. I was pleased that my coverage of the nuclear crisis at Los Alamos was promoted, though that lasted only for a few hours.

    But as far as I can tell, not one person diaried the Murdoch/ Brooks testimony. This despite the fact that most of what goes on in Washington is beneath contempt, much less diarying, while the fate of the Murdoch empire will be far more influential than most events reported in the political news.

    • jo6pac said

      I’ve noticed the fragmentation myself and it’s get a little tiresome at times. I thought I had been banned to comment there but was told they have a problem with the software and I admit it has gotten better. I have been banned at Digby not sure why because I agree with her most of the time.

      Yes this is big story and would love for this empire to fall but you just never know with today’s total corrupt corp. /govt. officials.

      • Charles II said

        It may seem that one is banned even if one hasn’t been, Jo. One problem, as Phoenix Woman has pointed out, is that the browser cache may need to be flushed. There are also sometimes problems if things like Java or scripts have been disabled. Finally, if one has dynamic addressing, it’s possible that a troll who was using the IP was banned, and that now you have inherited the bad IP.

  5. jo6pac said

    Tried the above and sent an email to DB no reply, no big deal. I do drop by on Sundays for the movie report but can’t say thank you, oh well. Oh I was banned at another site but after a comment by me at Glen G. site they allowed me back on to my suprise. Oh well time for wine and figure out dinner.

    I think in the next week we’ll see how far the Media Trial of the Century goes, they are the bottom feeders but the others aren’t not close behind and I include pbs/npr.

  6. Stormcrow said to change the game rules under which we are forced to operate ..

    I think the only way those rules are going to change is when the game gets broken.

    Along with, I’m afraid, most of the players, and entirely too many people who are at least half decent, but who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Because there’s only one way that’s going to happen: system collapse. Probably both catastrophic and bloody. Certainly non-survivable for the polity.

    What’ll emerge from that will be nothing that resembles democratic political process even as much as our present wretched charade does.

    Rome after the Third Century Crisis: Diocletian.

    China after the fall of the Qing dynasty. The Kuomintang, followed by civil war and Mao.

    • Charles II said

      I fear you are right, but I pray you are not, Stormcrow.

      I think a lot depends on how the left conducts itself. Can it offer a better vision for a new order? Or will it simply promise to oppress a different group of people?

      • jo6pac said

        I’ll keep my fingers crossed that it doesn’t end the way some us of think it will.

        I’m the left and all I want is those that broke the law go to jail no matter who they are and I don’t want to oppress anyone but with the dumbing down of Amerika and people afraid to question what they are told, I don’t hold much hope of that happening no matter who wins/loses.

        Yes Great picture;)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: