Mercury Rising 鳯女

Politics, life, and other things that matter

Chavez concedes narrow defeat of Venezuelan constitutional reforms

Posted by Charles II on December 2, 2007

Added 12:40AM, Eastern:  Hugo Chavez, once again proving himself to be so much classier than his opponents, has conceded defeat in the reform of the Venezuelan constitution. The margin is so close (1.4%) that he thinks that the remaining ballots might win it for him, but he said that he didn’t want to put the country through an experience like the US in 2000. The country had indicated that it wasn’t enthusiastically for the reforms, so he would accept their verdict.

So, ok, anti-Chavistas, you keep saying he’s a totalitarian, but you’re still the people who do coups. You say he’s disloyal to the country, but you’re the ones who run to the American government when you don’t get the vote to go the way you want.  You have a much better president than you credit him for… and a much better president than the US has.

I am not at all sad to see these reforms go down. Maybe it will convince Chavez’s cohort that they need to start building leadership that can carry their movement after their leader has stepped down. ________________________________  

There’s an old joke about a football player, having a bad rookie season, being asked by the press: “Jim, coach says that your perfomance is so bad that it can only be ignorance or apathy. What do you say to that?”

And Jim replied, “Well, I don’t know and I don’t care.” 

Early reports (here and Radio Venezuela with English translation here) suggest that most many Venezuelans of all castes are simply ignoring the election. If there’s any sabotage or violence, it would be later in the day, when the opposition is planning to clog voting places (but probably would be unable to do so except in a few districts). There have been sixteen arrests.

Updates follow:

Update, 3:50 Eastern, from Radio Venezuela, Mike Fox reporting: Polls are near official closing time. Results will come out at 7PM Eastern. Voting remains light, though there was a late surge, which will keep the polls open later than the nominal closing time. The Chavistas express optimism.

Via the pro-government Aporrea, there is a complaint that the anti-reformists are distributing pamphlets inside of voting stations, conducting illegal exit polling, and buying votes.

Update, 4:05 Eastern, Radio Venezuela: At the largest polling place at Andres Bello Liceo, 65% of registered voters have voted. There’s a noisy demo by anti-reformists who want to witness the vote counting. There was a small group of pro-reformists. The gates of the polling place have been closed. There has been no violence.

Update, 5:45 Eastern, Radio Venezuela: At Andres Bello School (not the Liceo) in an affluent part of the city, there’s a small group of people. No official results, but exit polls published by El Mundo and other sources say that the reforms have been approved. 

El Mundo/Reuters says reforms approved by 6-8 points, with about 50% turnout.

Update, 6:40PM, Radio Venezuela: There have been reports of illegalities by the right-wing Podemos in Sucre; also the right-wing is making loud claims of fraud. Also, a report that some polling places were closed while people were in line. A student leader of the opposition is speaking, reaffirming their position but neither conceding defeat nor claiming victory.

Gregory Wilpert has a good analytical article explaining what the reforms mean and what they don’t mean. He says:

      Despite this rather depressing state of affairs for the opposition, Chavez handed the opposition yet another chance to redeem itself when he launched the constitutional reform. Chavez says that this move was necessary for the deepening of Venezuela’s socialist transformation, but, strictly speaking, many of these changes could have been made without the reform and those that could not, could have waited until 2012 for a more deliberate reform process than the one that took place.

     By rushing the reform process Chavez presented the opposition with a nearly unprecedented opportunity to deal him a serious blow.

Indeed, many centrists were alienated and Chavez has wounds to heal. However, he may have gambled that a constitutional change would make these changes irreversible.

Update, 7:00, Eastern. You can see  a picture of the lines at 9AM at Liceo Andres Bello, courtesy of Julia_1984, a member of the student opposition. Radio Venezuela: A student opposition leader is urging people to stay at the polls. Thirty percent of polls are just now closing. It will take two or three hours to count and then there’s an audit, so earliest results are more like 9-10 PM Eastern. The armed, violent group Trece in Merida arrived after poll closings and started crying “Fraud.”

Update, 10:55 Eastern: No news yet.

7 Responses to “Chavez concedes narrow defeat of Venezuelan constitutional reforms”

  1. Eli said

    If they’re ignorant and apathetic, then I have the perfect president for them.

  2. Charles said

    Can we spare him, Eli?

  3. So Chavez wants to dump term limits. Funnily enough, so do the Republicans whenever somebody like Ronald Reagan is in power — and back during the first phase of Bush II: The Avignon Presidency, when Bush’s numbers were still artificially goosed from 9/11, they wanted to do so then, too. Now that Bush’s ratings are in the toilet: Not so much — especially with the likelihood, verging on lead-pipe cinch (at least that’s what the business community thinks), that a Democrat will be in the Oval Office come January of 2009.

  4. Charles said

    Ronald Reagan said he wanted to nail the pendulum to the right. These people just do not get the idea of letting people decide what they want.

  5. It’s quite telling that, as Gregory Wilpert describes it, the one proposed change that really could possibly pose a restriction of democracy — the proposals to make it harder to start and pass referenda — are ones that the anti-Chavista elites LIKE, so they’re not whining about those proposed changes. Kinda gives their game away, doesn’t it?

  6. Charles said

    I think that some of the changes are potentially restrictive to freedom, PW. On the one hand, power is centralized in the executive through, for example, eliminating the Central Bank. On the other hand, new and potentially unaccountable power centers are created through people’s councils. The workplace democracy provisions would be scary to just about any employer, because they seem to vest decision-making power about the business in the employees.

    I’m very much in favor of community-based power and workplace democracy. But the devil is in the details, and statutes– not constitutional amendments– are the best way to spell out details.

  7. Oh, exactly. Many if not most of the proposed changes were not very well thought out (if not outright silly), which means that even with the best of intentions they can become the Devil’s playground. (Then again, I find that proposed constitutional amendments in America often suffer from that same problem.)

    The people’s councils to me sound more like an attempt at the direct democracy of New England-style “town meetings” that is given much lip service but which turns out to be singularly unworkable on a large scale. But perhaps, if Venezuela can get its rural areas hooked to the internet, this might be a good deal more feasible — and Venezuela is considerably smaller than the US in both size and especially population (its land area is between that of Texas and Alaska, but its population is more in line with that of New England).

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.