Mercury Rising 鳯女

Politics, life, and other things that matter

Zombie Lies And The WaPo’s War On Hugo Chavez

Posted by Phoenix Woman on February 7, 2008

I read this in yesterday’s StarTribune (reprinted from the Washington Post) and immediately knew it had to be bullshit:

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez and his followers have sought to harass and intimidate the Catholic Church, the media, university students, political opponents and multinational companies doing business in Venezuela, to name just a few targets. Thus it can hardly come as a surprise that Chávez would also attack the Jewish community. Indeed, it’s an old, old story.

Sure enough, not only is it bullshit, it was originally debunked over two years ago but keeps being revived:

Are the Washington Post‘s editorial pages entitled to not just their own opinions, but also their own facts? This seems to be the case with the paper’s commentary on Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, where editors and columnists have shown a disturbing pattern of inaccuracy and unaccountability.

In a November 24 column, Charles Krauthammer used a deceptively edited phrase in order to portray a Chávez speech as anti-Semitic. After chiding actor Sacha Baron Cohen for using his film Borat to go after small-time anti-Semitism in the United States, Krauthammer listed what he saw as more menacing instances of anti-Semitism, including:

In Venezuela, Hugo Chávez says that the “descendants of the same ones that crucified Christ” have “taken possession of all the wealth in the world.”

The idea that Chávez was making an anti-Semitic slur was debunked when these quotes first circulated. (See FAIR Action Alert, “Editing Chávez to Manufacture a Slur,” 1/23/06.) As FAIR pointed out, Chávez’s speech referred collectively to “the descendents of those who crucified Christ, the descendents of those who expelled Bolivar from here” as one and the same, saying they represented the “less than 10 percent of the world population [who] own more than half of the riches of the world.” Chávez was clearly referring generically to the wealthy and powerful; by Krauthammer’s reading one would have to conclude that Chávez thinks Jews persecuted Simon Bolivar and account for more than 600 million of the world’s population.

As American Rabbi Arthur Waskow told the Associated Press (1/5/06), “I know of no one who accuses the Jews of fighting against Bolivar.” FAIR’s alert noted that Jewish groups in Venezuela rejected the anti-Semitic reading of Chávez’s speech. A letter sent by the Confederation of Jewish Associations of Venezuela to the Simon Wiesenthal Center (AP, 1/14/06), a U.S. group promoting the deceptively edited quote, stated: “We believe the president was not talking about Jews,” adding, “you have acted on your own, without consulting us, on issues that you don’t know or understand.” The American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress agreed with the Venezuelan group’s view that Chávez was not referring to Jews in his speech (Inter Press Service, 1/13/06).

But is Krauthammer’s smear part of a larger pattern at the Post? In April, Post deputy editorial page editor Jackson Diehl wrote (4/10/06) that Chávez “has never enjoyed overwhelming support in Venezuela,” adding, “his ratings have mostly fluctuated a few points above and below 50 percent.”

As FAIR explained in a letter to Diehl asking for his documentation (“Ignoring Inaccuracy at the Washington Post,” 5/2/06), Chávez has won three elections with totals ranging from 56 to 60 percent of the popular vote, and opinion polls registered support for Chávez from 68 to 71 percent—as reported in Diehl’s own paper (12/5/05).

FAIR’s reasoned letter never received a response, which raises a question about accountability at the Post‘s editorial pages.

ACTION: Please ask Washington Post ombud Deborah Howell to ensure that Post commentary measures up to minimal standards of accuracy. Please cc executive editor Leonard Downie Jr. on your correspondence.

CONTACT:
Deborah Howell, Ombudsman
ombudsman@washpost.com
Phone: (202) 334-7582

Ah, yes. Lil’ Debbie the pearl-clutcher has no problem with lies and smear, but don’t you dare cuss at a recipient of a WaPo paycheck!

6 Responses to “Zombie Lies And The WaPo’s War On Hugo Chavez”

  1. Michael said

    Might I also point out that it was the Romans who did the crucifying?

  2. Charles said

    Krauthammer has not only his own facts, he has his own universe in which to keep them.

  3. Ray said

    hey guys, look what I found

    http://www.adl.org/main_International_Affairs/venezuela_anti_semitism_report.htm

  4. Charles said

    Ray, the ADL is simply wrong. If you parse their statement closely, you’ll notice that it says a lot less than the headline might suppose.

    First of all, it accuses him of Fostering anti-Semitism. Not of being anti-Semitic.

    Next, consider this statement: “Chavez has taken an aggressively hostile foreign policy stance against America and the West and, by extension, the State of Israel.” Now, this is a pretty amazing statement. The US has attempted to murder Chavez in a coup. Yet if he responds with hostility to the US, he is automatically attacking Israel? This doesn’t pass the laugh test.

    Next, when one looks at the specifics of what the ADL calls “Intimidation and Vandalism,” there’s no evidence of government involvement. Rather, it describes people of Arab descent protesting. Was it misdirected for protestors to go to a synagogue? Of course. But the solution for this is for Israel to stop settling in the West Bank and to leave the Palestinians alone. The whole world has come to that conclusion, and if the Likud and its sympathizers abroad don’t like it, they are going to find themselves feeling very, very lonely.

    I could go on, but I think the point is made. The ADL has not made a good case. In fact, the case it made makes it look as if it were written by John Bolton.

  5. Not only that, it’s essentially the same garbage that was in Foxman’s WaPo piece — which, if you actually read my blog entry, you’d know was debunked twice before when it was being regurgitated by serial liars like Krauthammer.

    But Ray apparently doesn’t care about lies when they’re used to go after people who have made it their life’s work to help others.

  6. Charles said

    Foxman is head of ADL, so presumably he wrote and/or approved the report. But the report at least makes specific allegations that can be refuted.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.