There are some stories that make me want to pistol whip the reporter. Nicholas Confessore of the NYT reports that there is enormous waste in the NY State budget:
Well, ok. Wasting money is bad. But as we parse through the story, we discover that the grand total of this alleged waste is…1% of the state budget. Most businesses would be thrilled to discover that that is the extent of their waste.
The story provides no context for a lot of the lurid details. For example, is Confessore proposing that Jewish (and Muslim) prisoners be forced to eat pork as part of their punishment? Are the numbers that haven’t been dialed in months, numbers where people can report financial fraud and could therefore save millions at the cost of thousands? How many square feet of office space is there? These are facts that one shouldn’t have to pistol whip reporters to get them to include them in their stories.
The only unambiguously serious point that I found in Confessore’s article is that data centers which are supposed to provide redundancy are located within a few miles of one another, meaning that a disaster could threaten the integrity of NY State’s data. That’s worth worrying about.
And, as we parse through the story, we discover that no context is provided for exactly who was in charge during the past years, when all this vast amount (1%) of waste developed. From 1995-2006, the governor was Republican George Pataki. Elliott Spitzer was in charge for slightly over a year when he was forced out for the specious reason that he had used the services of a prostitute, something that one can bet that half the men in the legislature have done as well. This put the inept David Paterson in charge for slightly over 2 years.
Furthermore–and this is a key point– the landlord for much of New York’s governmental real estate is Carl Paladino, a reactionary Tea Party figure whose crony insider relationships with Republicans in Albany enriched him at taxpayer expense. Not that one can blame the Republicans entirely for Paladino– he was a Democrat until it became inconvenient.
The state senate was Republican for many years until 2009. The Assembly has been more evenly divided, but Republicans had control for many, many of the relevant years.
So, you’ll get no argument from me that both parties have been derelict in oversight, but it strikes me that one cannot understand the story of inefficiency without naming some names, most of which would be Republican. I would not call 1% inefficiency a big story, but in times of tight budgets, it’s the kind of thing that raises resentments. Cuomo, I would say, is–with Confessore’s assistance– grandstanding, but maybe reforms will keep a few more widows and orphans off the streets. But for the life of me I cannot understand how the NY Times can write a story about “waste, fraud, and abuse” without naming the names of people who could have done something, and didn’t.
As the story is written, it simply feeds into the atmosphere of Neroism that afflicts our national scene. It is an abuse of the power of the media.